I liked the first version so much I called it "epic."  The as-posted
version of this one looks way too dark; the gamma-corrected version on
your page looks like an "over-gamma-corrected" version of a too-dark
image.

WHY did you make it so much darker?

I want to know because I may be at fault!

I have feared that I've got the gamma so screwed up my monitor(s) that I
run into a bunch of problems: too dark printer output, too dark T-shirt
printing, many high-ranking IRTC entries look crappily dark to me, etc.



Gail Shaw wrote:

> When I posted my street scene on monday I posted
> a 'watered down' version of the picture. This is because was rendering
> at work and didn't have all my includes and textures.
>
> So here is the full picture. Comments as always are appreciated.
> The scene is dark, so some people might have to play with gamma.
> Desired brightness is just being able to see the details close to the
> camera.
>
> Gail
> *******************************************************************
> * gsh### [at] monotixcoza              * ERROR: COFFEE.COM not found  *
> * http://www.rucus.ru.ac.za/~gail/ * Insert cup and press any key *
> *******************************************************************
> * Definition of an upgrade: Take the old bugs out, put new ones in*
> *******************************************************************
>
>  [Image]

Post a reply to this message